Skip to content
Hendersons - Barristers' Chambers


Henderson Chambers has a leading reputation in Commercial litigation and Arbitration, both in this jurisdiction and in large scale international disputes. Our Commercial silks and juniors are known for their strategic approach, business sector acumen and excellence in trial advocacy. Many are ranked as leading practitioners in the field by the legal directories.

Clients come to Henderson Chambers for representation in the full range of disputes in the Commercial Court, Chancery Division, TCC, Mercantile and other courts and those referred to arbitration. Our members are instructed in proceedings offshore and routinely represent overseas clients in disputes in this jurisdiction.

Members of Henderson Chambers are known for bringing particular sector expertise to the handling of complex commercial claims. In recent years they have been instructed in heavyweight and high profile cases involving life sciences, oil and gas, banking and financial services, automotive, IT and telecoms, transportation, and in the design, manufacture and supply of products.

Add to shortlist

Contact the Commercial clerking team.

If you require help or advice please contact our clerking team.

Call - +44 (0)20 7583 9020
or email our clerks

Representative cases

grid list
  • Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd

    One of The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2018

    More than 500 current and former postmasters are taking on the Post Office over alleged failures in the electronic point of sales (EPS) and accounting system. The claimants say that this caused false figures to appear in monthly accounts and trigger false losses, which came directly out of employees’ pockets.

    The sub-postmasters allege that the failures are so great that they have caused a number of employees to lose their jobs and face prosecution for theft and false accounting.

    The group is pursuing the Post Office for around £120m over claims including breach of contract, deceit, negligent mis-statement, economic duress, harassment and malicious prosecution. The claims have already been subject to parliamentary scrutiny.

  • Google Data Breach Class Action

    Google Data Breach Class Action

    A representative action on behalf of approximately 5.4 million iPhone users issued against Google November 2017.

Commercial Barristers

Charles Gibson QC
Call: 1984 Silk: 2001

Richard Mawrey QC
Call: 1964 Silk: 1986

Peter Susman QC
Call: 1966 Silk: 1997

Lawrence West QC
Call: 1979 Silk: 2003

Prashant Popat QC
Call: 1992 Silk: 2008

Patrick Green QC
Call: 1990 Silk: 2012

Geraint Webb QC
Call: 1995 Silk: 2013

Oliver Campbell QC
Call: 1992 Silk: 2014

Malcolm Sheehan QC
Call: 1993 Silk: 2015

Toby Riley-Smith QC
Call: 1995 Silk: 2016

Andrew Kinnier QC
Call: 1996 Silk: 2018

Henry Warwick QC
Call: 2007 (Solicitor: 2000) Silk: 2020

William Hibbert
Call: 1979

James Palmer
Call: 1983

Jonathan Steinert
Call: 1986

David Brook
Call: 1988

Julia Smith
Call: 1988

Angus Withington
Call: 1995

Tim Green
Call: 1996

Adam Heppinstall
Call: 1999

Noel Dilworth
Call: 2001

James Purnell
Call: 2002

Nazeer Chowdhury
Call: 2002

Kathleen Donnelly
Call: 2005

Abigail Cohen
Call: 2005

Matthew Richardson
Call: 2006

Jonathan Lewis
Call: 2007 (Solicitor: 2005)

Thomas Evans
Call: 2008

Lucy McCormick
Call: 2008

Dennis Rosenthal
Call: 2009 (Solicitor: 1977-2009)

Elizabeth Tremayne
Call: 2009

Hannah Curtain
Call: 2010

James Williams
Call: 2010 (Solicitor: 2008)

Rachel Tandy
Call: 2010

Ognjen Miletic
Call: 2010

Chloe Campbell
Call: 2011

Christopher Adams
Call: 2014

Lia Moses
Call: 2014

Celia Oldham
Call: 2015

Reanne MacKenzie
Call: 2016

Harrison Denner
Call: 2016

Beatrice Graham
Call: 2016

Shortlist Builder


Select the Expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download Add to shortlist
Shortlist close
Title Type CV

Remove All


Click here to email this list.