Skip to content
Hendersons - Barristers' Chambers

James Purnell

"Amazing capacity for hard work, calm and with excellent judgement."

Legal 500 2022


Call
2002

James Purnell is recommended in the legal directories for his expertise in product liability, group actions, personal injury, health and safety and environment law.

Product Liability and Group Actions: In the fields of product liability and personal injury, James has particular expertise in representing defendants facing group litigation, or multiple claims which are the subject of co-ordinated case management. James’s clients frequently are multi-national concerns which involves consideration of issues of jurisdiction, applicable law, and the co-ordination of case management with litigation in other jurisdictions. Recent examples include: metal-on-metal hip litigation, vaginal mesh litigation, fetal anticonvulsant litigation, heater-cooler unit litigation. Recommended by the Legal 500 (2019) and Chambers & Partners (2020).

Personal Injury: James has considerable experience in defending personal injury claims of all kinds, including particular experience representing the Government facing group claims for ill-treatment alleged by foreign nationals against members of the UK armed forces: the Iraqi civilian litigation, and the Cyprus emergency litigation.

Health & Safety / Environment: In the fields of health and safety and environment law, James regularly represents companies and individuals facing regulatory investigations and prosecutions. In addition to prosecuting and defending cases in the criminal courts, James has a wealth of experience in appealing against improvement and prohibition notices. Recommended by the Legal 500 (2017).

Inquests: Dovetailing with his product liability and health and safety practice, James has considerable experience in representing clients’ interests at coroner’s inquests and for the purpose of submissions concerning reports to prevent future deaths. Recommended by the Legal 500 (2017).

Business Protection / Commercial: James frequently represents companies in disputes with regulatory bodies and trade associations, competition claims involving breach of confidentiality and breach of directors’ duties, and in litigation involving employment disputes including claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, victimization, harassment and discrimination.


For more information about the way barristers at Henderson Chambers work, including our terms of engagement, fee transparency statement and our complaints process, please click here.  Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.

Please click here for a copy of James Purnell’s privacy policy.

 

Expertise


Product Liability and Group Actions

Highlights and representative group cases include:

  • The fetal anticonvulsant litigation: a group action in the High Court brought by children alleging congenital defects as a result of in utero exposure to an anti-epilepsy drug taken by their mother during pregnancy.
  • Stress urinary incontinence litigation: the co-ordinated case management of a group of claims alleging defects in transvaginal tape used in the treatment of SUI.
  • Pelvic organ prolapse litigation: the co-ordinated case management of a group of claims alleging defects in mesh used in the treatment of POP.
  • Metal on metal hip litigation: a group action in the High Court brought by claimants alleging defect in metal on metal hip prosthesis.
  • PIP breast implants litigation: representing a private hospital defendant in the group litigation brought by claimants alleged unsatisfactory breast implants.

Examples of individual cases include:

  • £14m property damage claim arising out of supply and installation of a defective electrical miniature circuit board, resulting in fire and massive property destruction.
  • Acting on behalf of a pharmaceutical company in an action brought by a consumer in respect of alleged personal injury sustained after being injected in hands and beneath the eyes with poly-L-lactic acid.
  • Acting on behalf of a facial cream company in an action brought by a consumer in respect of alleged burns sustained after applying a slow release cream to the cheek bone, below the eye and arm.
  • Advising e-cigarette manufacturer on EU and UK product safety and labelling requirements.
  • Advising a pharmaceutical company as to potential liability for HIV and Hepatitis contracted by a haemophiliac during blood transfusion.

James has particular experience in claims involving food safety (including Campylobacter infection) and agricultural claims (defective animal feed).

James wrote the chapter entitled “Product liability for medicinal products” in Powers & Barton’s “Clinical Negligence”, 5th ed (Bloomsbury), described by Hickinbottom J as a “commendable consideration of the issues surrounding product liability for medicinal products” in Wilkes v DePuy [2018] 2 WLR 531.

Representative cases

grid list
  • Gee v DePuy International Ltd (21 May 2018)

    Representing interested party in metal on metal hip litigation.

  • The Fetal Anti Convulsant Litigation

    As a result of the variety of claims alleged to have been caused by in utero exposure to sodium valproate, James has experience of expert evidence in the fields of: biostatics; epidemiology; teratology; clinical genetics; autistic spectrum disorders; adult neurology; paediatric neurology; neuropsychology; neo-natology; maternal fetal medicine; pharmacology; minor malformations; and pharmaceutical regulation.

  • GLO v Sanofi [2009] EWHC 95 (QB)

    Application of the “fair apportionment of risk” in the EC Product Liability and whether it entitled claimants to adduce expert evidence on the sales and profitability of a medicine; the use of travaux preparatoires and recitals as interpretative aids in the construction of EC legislation.

  • Factor VIII Litigation

    Advising a pharmaceutical company as to potential liability for HIV and Hepatitis contracted by a haemophiliac during blood transfusion, including: the long-stop limitation defence; forum non conveniens; and the effect of a settlement in another jurisdiction; the state of knowledge and the “development risks defence”.

  • JJML SUI Products Litigation & JJML POP Products Litigation

    James is representing the interests of the manufacturer of medical devices for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in the defence of claims brought by multiple claimants alleging defects/negligence.  Carefully case managed as co-ordinated High Court group claims.

  • Primodos Litigation

    James is representing the interests of the manufacturer of hormone pregnancy test pharmaceutical products in the defence of claims brought by multiple claimants alleging congenital defects as a result of in utero exposure to HPTs.  High Court group claims.

Health & Safety

James is recommended as a leading junior in the Legal 500 for his expertise in Health & Safety and Environment litigation: “Clients assert that James Purnell delivers ‘very practical and insightful advice on the procedural and legal issues and also in relation to case strategy’”. In the field of health & safety and environment law, James is equally adept in the criminal courts as in the civil courts and is able to advise clients on their rights and liabilities arising in either arena. James is on the HSE’s List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates.

Recent instructions include:

  • Defending a cemetery company in a 2 week trial for breach of environmental health legislation including the depositing of waste without a licence.
  • Defending the company which undertakes legionella risk assessments in a prosecution brought by the HSE. In addition to the criminal prosecution, James also represented the company in its appeal against an improvement notice.
  • Representing the defendant waste management company in a prosecution arising out of a fatality.
  • Representing the interests of the employer of a JCB operator at an inquest in relation to a death at West Ham LUL station.
  • Representing the interests of the employer and driver of an HGV lorry at in inquest in relation to a death on the A2.
  • Defending a landlord charged with an offence under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations, for failure to ensure that her tenanted properties had valid gas safety certificates.
  • Defending a company charged with a HSWA offence arising out of a hand injury to an apprentice operating a guillotine in a bridge manufacturing factory.
  • Defending a coach company charged with that offence under the Road Traffic Act 1988, that one of its coaches was in a condition such that its use involved a danger of injury to other people (the wheels fell off the bus).
  • Defending a truck driver charged with an offence under the Road Traffic Act 1988, for failure to secure a load, causing damage to other road users.
  • Representing a corporate motivation company in a prosecution for health and safety offences arising out of a fire-walking exercise;
  • Representing a retail company in a prosecution for breach of health and safety and environmental protection legislation;
  • Representing an agricultural company in a successful appeal against Environmental Protection Act notices;
  • Representing a games company in a prosecution for health and safety matters and offences contrary to the Town and Country Planning Act;
  • Advising one of the country’s largest Housing Associations as to its obligations under Health and Safety legislation as a landlord and as an employer in respect of Legionnaires’ Disease.

Personal Injury

James is a specialist personal injury barrister. His expertise extends to claims for occupational disease, catastrophic injury claims, chronic pain claims, torture claims, sexual abuse and psychiatric harm claims, holiday claims, sports claims and product liability claims. James has particular experience in multi-party litigation, including group litigation, and regularly acts in cases involving issues of apportionment between more than one defendant.

James has particular experience involving claims by foreign nationals against the UK government seeking compensation for acts by UK armed forces. These cases are high profile and have high public interest elements and invariably involve private and public international law arguments. Examples of reported decisions include:

  • Sophocleous v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2018] EWHC 19 (QB): application for the rule of double actionability and choice of law.
  • Alseran v Ministry of Defence [2017] EWHC 3289 (QB): personal injury and human rights claims by Iraqi civilians against UK armed forces.
  • Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence [2017] EWHC 547 (QB): application of closed material procedure to personal injury and human rights claims by Iraqis.
  • Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence [2017] UKSC 2: Supreme Court case on the lawfulness of detention during non-international armed conflict
  • Rahmatullah v Ministry of Defence [2017] UKSC 1: Supreme Court case on the defence of Crown act of state to tort claims by foreign nationals arising out of the conduct of foreign policy.
  • Iraqi Civilian Litigation v Ministry of Defence [2016] UKSC 25: Supreme Court case on the application of the foreign law of limitation.
  • Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence [2016] 2 WLR 247: Court of Appeal case on the lawfulness of detention during non-international armed conflict.
  • Iraqi Civilians v Ministry of Defence [2015] EWHC 1254 (QB): trial on joint liability in Iraqi law.
  • Iraqi Civilians v Ministry of Defence [2015] 2 All ER 714: availability of aggravated damages in foreign law.

Representative cases

grid list
  • R (on the application of Mongson) v Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) 8 March 2018

    Court of Appeal decision on jurisdiction of criminal injuries compensation authority

  • XYZ v Atomic Weapons Establishment Plc [2013] (Master Whitaker)

    Representing defendant in £250k+ claim for mesothelioma brought by estate of widow exposed to asbestos dust brought home from work by her husband. Expert evidence in respiratory medicine, geriatrics, care management and Court of Protection costs.

  • Stokes v Ministry of Defence [2013]

    Representing defendant in £275k+ claim for mesothelioma brought by estate of deceased exposed to asbestos dust brought home from work by father. Complex Fatal Accidents Act claim including complex pension calculations.

  • Mason v Ministry of Defence [2013]

    Advising defendant in £250k+ claim for mesothelioma brought by estate of deceased exposed to asbestos by US Air Force at RAF Sculthorpe. Advising on NATO Status of Forces Agreement.

  • R v Atomic Weapons Establishment Plc [2012]

    Advising defendant in relation to claim for mesothelioma; advising on causation and application of de minimis principle; state of knowledge; liability under OLA 1957, negligence, Factories Act 1961, Asbestos Regulations 1969 and 1987; apportionment.

  • D’Arcy v London Underground Ltd [2012]

    Advising defendant in relation to three consolidated claims for degenerative spinal conditions allegedly caused by workplace conditions.

Environment

James is recognised as a specialist in the criminal and civil litigation that follow environmental disasters. He is recommended as a leading junior in environmental work by the Legal 500. James is on the Environment Agency’s List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates.
James has experience dealing with cases involving expert issues regarding the constitution of soil and waste, and with acoustic experts in noise nuisance cases. James acts in civil disputes, environmental prosecutions and abatement notice proceedings.

James has particular expertise in defending claims arising out of exposure to asbestos, including mesothelioma claims. He regularly represents and advises insurers and employers with regard to their liability for historic exposure and in contribution proceedings. James has considerable experience in matters such as the “show cause” procedure, causation, contribution, apportionment, state of knowledge, liability at common law, liability of occupiers & employers, Factories Acts, Asbestos Regulations and Control of Asbestos Regulations.

Recent instructions include:

  • Defending a private prosecution for noise nuisance arising out of game shooting.
  • Defending a cemetery company in a 2 week trial for breach of environmental health legislation including the depositing of waste without a licence, including geotechnical evidence on the movement of soil.
  • Defending the company which undertakes legionella risk assessments in a prosecution brought by the HSE. In addition to the criminal prosecution, James also represented the company in its appeal against an improvement notice.
  • Representing the defendant waste management company in a prosecution arising out of a fatality.
  • Representing a retail company in a prosecution for breach of health and safety and environmental protection legislation;
  • Representing an agricultural company in a successful appeal against Environmental Protection Act notices;
  • Advising one of the country’s largest Housing Associations as to its obligations under Health and Safety legislation as a landlord and as an employer in respect of Legionnaires’ Disease.

Commercial Insurance

James has expertise in the field of insurance coverage disputes, particularly in the relation to property damage and product liability, including recent litigation in the High Court and Court of Appeal

Recent instructions include:

  • Acting for claimant in action arising out of supply of commercial bottle suppliers to pubs and restaurants.
  • Advising subsidiaries of manufacturer of liability for property damage in UK caused by allegedly defective refrigerator in a motor home manufactured in Sweden, supplied in the US.
  • Advising in claims against suppliers and holiday park owners in multiple claims involving defective caravans.

Representative cases

grid list
  • Conarken Group Ltd v Network Rail [2011] EWCA Civ 644

    James represented the defendant at trial and on appeal to the Court of Appeal in the test case concerning the recoverability of complex penalty charges imposed by the rail regulator for delays arising from the damage of railway infrastructure caused by third party tortfeasors (usually motor vehicles). Several claims are brought each year by Network Rail against insurers of road traffic and heavy good vehicles arising from accidents where roads meet railways, costing the insurance industry tens of millions of pounds each year.

  • AXA Insurance UK Plc v Cunningham Lindsey UK Plc [2007] EWHC 3023 (TCC)

    James represented the defendant loss adjuster in a 2-month trial concerning the recoverability of damages following the negligent reconstruction of property following subsidence damage

  • Gleeson Group Plc v Frankona Reinsurance (2006) (TCC)

    Litigation arising out of dry rot damage during the course of a construction contract.

Business Protection & Employment

James frequently represents companies in disputes with regulatory bodies and trade associations, competition claims involving breach of confidentiality and breach of directors’ duties, and in litigation involving employment disputes including claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, victimization, harassment and discrimination.

Representative cases

grid list
  • Secretary of State for BIS v McDonagh [2013] ICR 1177

    employee’s rights in company voluntary arrangements, claims on the National Insurance Fund.

  • Secretary of State for Justice v Bowling [2012] IRLR 382

    Equal pay; material factor defence.

  • Secretary of State BIS v Coward (2011) EAT

    Notice pay; company insolvency.

  • Secretary of State BIS v Stones (2011) EAT

    Redundancy pay; company insolvency; TUPE transfer.

  • Eastern & Coastal Kent PCT v Jocelyn Grey (2009) IRLR 429

    Representing the claimant in disability discrimination claim (EAT).

  • Unegbu v Newman Stone [2008] All ER (D) 164 (Aug)

    Representing recruiter in application for costs in race discrimination claim (EAT).

Consumer Protection

James successfully represented the claimant consumer in the leading authority on consumer harassment: Lisa Ferguson v British Gas Trading plc (2009) 3 All ER 304 – (Court of Appeal).

Following the success of that case, James regularly advises both consumers and businesses as to their rights and liabilities in relation to billing and charging disputes.

 

What the directories say


"His work rate is phenomenal and his advice pragmatic."
Legal 500 2024

"James works extremely hard and absorbs huge quantities of material very quickly. He is clever and gives sensible, pragmatic advice."
Legal 500 2024

"James' advocacy in inquest matters is excellent, striking the right balance between sensitivity and a robust approach. His advice is clear and pragmatic."
Legal 500 2024

"James is a highly skilled senior junior. He is very personable and client-friendly and has a pragmatic and commercial approach."
Legal 500 2024

"James is a highly skilled senior junior. His advocacy in inquest matters is excellent, striking the right balance between sensitivity to the difficult nature of inquests yet also maintaining a robust position on behalf of his client."
Legal 500 2024

Instructing James Purnell

If you require help or advice please contact our clerking team

Call +44 (0)20 7583 9020
or email

Appointments
  • Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel (A Panel, 2019-2025)
  • Specialist Regulatory Panel Advocate for the HSE in Health & Safety and Environment Law – “List B” (2019)
  • Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel (B Panel, 2014-2019)
  • Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel (C Panel, 2009-2014)
  • Specialist Regulatory Panel Advocate for the Environment Agency & HSE – “List C” (2012)
Publications
  • Contributor to Clinical Negligence (6th Ed) Product Liability for Medical Products (Bloomsbury, 2023)
Memberships
  • Employment Lawyers Association
  • Employment Law Bar Association
  • Health & Safety Lawyers’ Association
  • London Common Law & Commercial Bar Association
  • Personal Injuries Bar Association
Education
  • Queen Mother Scholar (Middle Temple)
  • PGDipLaw (Distinction)
  • MA (Hons) (First Class)
Regulatory Information

All members of Chambers are registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales. For our standard contractual terms click here.

For more information about the way barristers at Henderson Chambers work, including our fee transparency statement and our complaints process, please click here.

Bar Council Number: 44554

VAT Registration Number: 820285647

Legal Status: Barrister

Professional Insurance: All members of Chambers have professional liability insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Ltd. Territorial coverage is world-wide and subject to the term of the Bar Mutual. Click here for details.

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board.

Shortlist Builder

Close

Select the Expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download Add to shortlist
Shortlist close
Title Type CV

Remove All

Download


Click here to email this list.