Tim Green KC
“Tim is a class act.” “A fantastic advocate who’s a joy to work with. He really knows how to bring out the best in a team.” “He is meticulous, hard working and very friendly.”
Chambers UK and Legal 500 2024
- Call
- 1996
- Silk
- 2022
- Tel:
- +44 (0)20 7583 9020
- Email:
- tgreenKC@hendersonchambers.co.uk
Tim Green KC is widely recognised as an exceptional advocate in the fields of product liability and safety, health and safety, and inquiries and inquests. He is instructed for the defence in one of the largest ever corporate manslaughter investigations arising from alleged failings in product safety, as well as by core participants in both the Grenfell Tower and Covid Public Inquiries. In 2022-23 Tim successfully responded to several complex and sensitive OPSS enforcement interventions against manufacturers and suppliers in the construction sector. He has appeared in many Article 2 EHCR and jury inquests arising from death alleged to have been caused by defective products and industrial processes in the building, health care, environmental and pharmaceutical industries. Tim was short-listed by Legal 500 Awards for Corporate Crime Silk of 2024, and by Chambers Bar UK Awards for Health and Safety Silk of 2023. He has been recognised as a leader at the Bar Chambers UK and Legal 500 in eight different categories related to investigations and regulatory enforcement. Some of Tim’s recent endorsements from the legal directories are below:
Products, Health & Safety and Environmental:
- “Tim Green has been superb” (Chambers UK 2025).
- “Tim is very measured and incisive in terms of comments” (Chambers 2025).
- “He’s a very smooth advocate and courtroom operator.” “His written communication is very strong; he is incisive and cuts to the core issues. He is superb.” “Tim is a very hard-working and generous barrister” (Chambers UK 2023).
- “A real grafter who’s incredibly logical in the way he approaches things. He’s not afraid to pull his sleeves up and get down and dirty and is also just a very pleasant person to work with.” “He produces great legal arguments which judges love” (Chambers UK 2024).
- “Tim is an excellent advocate”. “Tim is very experienced. He takes good care of clients”. “He is measured and on top of the detail” (Chambers UK 2023).
- “He is well respected in his field, excellent with the detail, a strong advocate and good at applying complex law to factual situations.” “A very good advocate – he holds his own in court and has a lot of gravitas.” “He does have real expertise and is genuinely a specialist in this area” (Chambers UK 2022).
- “Tim is a highly regarded KC in this field. His fighting spirit is a great asset for clients who are up against it on difficult cases” (Legal 500 2024).
- “Tim is a key figure in the field of health and safety and leads from the front” (Legal 500 2023).
- “Tim is a class act. He knows the legislation backwards and is always up to date with the latest case law” (Legal 500 2023).
Inquiries and Inquests:
- “Tim is a very strong advocate” (Chambers UK 2025).
- “Tim is good on his feet and strategically astute. He is able to cut through complex technical evidence quickly and efficiently” (Chambers UK 2024).
- “He is measured and on top of the detail, and the client trusts what he says. He has a commercial understanding of what is important to the client” (Chambers UK 2023).
- “Tim is extremely approachable. He has an excellent manner with clients and coroners and is able to gain the confidence and trust of both. He handles witnesses perfectly in what are often very difficult and emotionally charged situations” (Legal 500 2023).
- “Tim’s experience and technical knowledge enable him to stay abreast of detailed evidence and provide strategic, yet sensible advice to clients” (Legal 500 2025).
Tim is instructed by most leading and international firms in the UK market, as well as by regulators and governments. Recent clients include Network Rail, Kingspan, Medtronic, Moderna, Boston Scientific, AB Agri, FM Conway, John Murphy and Sons, the HSE, and a variety of other very large private and public undertakings. He has particular experience representing company officers accused of consenting or conniving in corporate wrongdoing. Tim has sat as a Recorder (part-time Crown Court Judge) since 2012 and frequently appears in the appellate courts including these four recent guideline decisions heard since 2018: Evergreen v HSE (bad character evidence in H&S trials), JHSL v HSE (applying H&S Sentencing Guidelines), St Michaels Hospice v ESFRS (sentencing fire safety offences), Workchain v TpR (sentencing data crime) and Bell v HMAG (cash forfeiture arising from simultaneous criminal investigation). Tim is a contributing-editor of the leading textbook “The Proceeds of Crime” and ranked as one of the top ten UK POCA lawyers by “Business Today” magazine.
For more information about the way barristers at Henderson Chambers work, including our terms of engagement, fee transparency statement and our complaints process, please click here. Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
Please click here for a copy of Tim Green’s privacy policy.
Expertise
Health & Safety
Tim is widely acknowledged by Chambers UK and Legal 500 as being one of the Bar’s leaders in health and safety and product safety work. He has been instructed in one of the most complex and serious investigations concerning corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter ever undertaken arising from alleged product failings during the Grenfell Tower fire, as well as the full spectrum of HSWA offences across a range of sectors. Tim often advises very large corporate clients and their company officers on the health and safety aspects of high value commercial disputes where timely advice and commercial sensitivity are paramount. Tim was shortlisted for Health & Safety Silk of the Year 2023 in the Chambers Bar Awards and has been consistently ranked in band 1/tier1 by Chambers UK and the Legal 500 for his health & safety practice. He is also the only KC ranked for this work on the Midlands Circuit.
Over the last three years Tim has defended or prosecuted over 30 cases arising from death or serious injury at work. He also has an extensive advisory practice assisting very private and public undertakings on the application of health & safety law in the context of commercial disputes. Tim has specific experience of health & safety law applied to the following sectors:
- Agricultural – working at height; use of specialised machinery.
- Construction – numerous investigations arising from falls from height; asbestos exposure; electrocution whilst conducting roof work; collapsed buildings.
- Defence – advice and representation in the context of large commercial dispute arising from alleged defects in safety of tanks and armoured vehicles.
- Engineering – avoidable death in a metal forge; and HAVS/CTS exposure during manufacturing process, PUWER.
- Fire safety – Fire Safety Order applied to (i) a hospice following arson and deaths of three patients: (ii) to the company director of a housing trust managing multi-occupancy accommodation following two accidental fires.
- Grenfell Tower Inquiry – representing very large corporate manufacturer of insulation as Core Participant.
- Health care – avoidable deaths in care homes arising from unsuitable hospital environment.
- Life sciences – fatalities alleged to be occasioned by the Covid vaccine; fatality alleged to be occasioned by anti-psychotic medicine; fatalities alleged to be caused by defective heart pumps.
- Logistics – advice and representation to large civil engineering undertakings in HSE investigations arising from deaths at work and on the highways.
- Manufacturing – advice and representation to several different multi-national corporations facing OPSS investigations into alleged breaches of UK and EU product standards.
- Waste industry – death of a binman on waste collection rounds; multiple investigations following deaths in recycling/scrap metal works; accidental death through falling into a lorry bin.
Tim’s health & safety practice also includes regular instructions to appear at inquests representing companies, public bodies, charities and families of the deceased before juries and/or where Article 2 of the ECHR is engaged. His clients include several FTSE 100 companies where the impact of the inquiry on prosecution and upon reputational risk is a paramount.
Tim is instructed by most leading and international firms in the UK market, as well as by regulators and governments. Recent clients include Network Rail, Kingspan, Boston Scientific, AB Agri, FM Conway, John Murphy and Sons, Medtronic, the HSE, and a variety of other very large private and public undertakings. Tim has sat as a Recorder (part-time Crown Court Judge) since 2012 and frequently appears in the appellate courts including these four recent guideline decisions heard since 2018: HSE v Evergreen (bad character evidence in regulatory crime), HSE v John Henry and Sons Ltd (applying H&S Sentencing Guidelines), ESFRS v St Michael’s Hospice (sentencing fire safety offences), Workchain v TpR (sentencing data crime) and Bell v HMAG (cash forfeiture arising from simultaneous criminal investigation). Tim is a contributing-editor of the leading textbook “The Proceeds of Crime”.
In the past 4 years Tim has been asked to deliver training on best practice in advocacy, law and process at the HSLA annual conference (twice), London, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham and Bristol.
Representative cases
grid list-
Re AY 2024
Representing very large US pharmaceutical manufacturer at A2 jury inquest said to arise from reaction to Covid vaccine. Conclusion was death by natural causes – vaccine non-causative.
-
Re JL 2024
Representing very large US medical manufacturer in jury inquest said to arise from defective heart pump. Conclusion was death by natural causes – heart pump failure not attributable to manufacturer.
-
R v K Ltd 2024
Representing a £4bn corporation and its company officers during a uniquely sensitive and complex investigation into corporate manslaughter, environmental and health and safety offences and fraud arising from a catastrophic fire.
-
HSE v DG and DMGT 2024
Defence of an amusement ride inspection consultancy and company officer during a highly complex HSE investigation with 4 experts following serious accident.
-
HSE v Evergreen 2023
Defence of principal contractor and company director at trial and before the Court of Appeal concerning admissibility of bad character evidence arising from workplace fatality.
-
Re G Ltd 2022
Advising multi-national defence contractor on health and safety concerns that are key to very high value commercial litigation.
-
Re M Ltd 2022
Advising multi-national car manufacturer on health and safety risks and liability arising from alleged defects.
-
Re L Ltd 2022
Represented a global construction company in precedent setting OPSS investigation into alleged product defects.
-
HI&S v Elder Grange Limited 2021 IoM
Defence of care home company and its officers during a prosecution arising from fire in sheltered accommodation.
-
HSE v EES Chelmsford CC 2021
Defending in a 2-week trial prosecuted by the HSE arising from very serious accident on building site concerning correct applications of CDM Regulations.
-
HSE v Carmet Marine 2021
Defending in HSE prosecution of a marine maintenance company arising from fatality during on site repairs of a tugboat.
-
HSE v Royston Ford 2021
Defending a company in HSE prosecution arising from repeated breaches of PUWER Regulations in complex manufacturing plant.
-
HSE v Leadec UK Limited Birmingham CC 2020
Defence of large company following fatality arising from use of a high- pressure jet washer hose in overlapping coronial and criminal proceedings. Complex issues of causation and question of resources of linked parent company. National media coverage.
-
HSE v Scapa UK Limited Luton 2020
Defence of a medium sized company following fatality in linked coronial and criminal proceeding. Successfully deployed COVID and Brexit related mitigation to achieve a fine of less than 1/3 of the starting point applying the relevant Guidelines.
-
HSE v JW and Mersea Limited Chelmsford CC 2020
Death on construction site leading to prosecution of director and company in one of the UK’s first full remote sentencing hearings lasting one day.
-
HSE v Evergreen and others Birmingham CC 2020
Sensitive 3 week trial of multiple duty holders arising from death on a construction site.
-
HSE v EMSL and Amey Northampton CC 2020
Complex 3 week prosecution of two very large companies arising for the accidental death of a banksman when run over by a bin lorry.
-
MCA v Port of London Authority (“PLA”) and others Snaresbrook CC 2019
Successful defence of the PLA accused of serious maritime safety offences arising from a fatality on the Thames when a tugboat was “run over” by a barge it was towing down the River Thames. Trial before Thornton J lasting 7 weeks and hearing evidence from eight maritime experts.
-
Inquest re SMH East Sussex Coroner’s Court 2019
Complex inquiry into death of three patients at a hospice following arson by another patient. Complex and concurrent coronial, civil and criminal proceedings.
-
East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service v St Michael’s Hospice [2019] EWCA Crim 161
Defended a prosecution in respect of the Fire Safety Order arising from an arson at a Hospice following which three patients died.
-
HSE v Lightpower & W Hereford CC 2019
Defended company and director in simultaneous coronial and criminal proceedings following fatal fall from height on construction site where deceased was the brother of the defendant director.
-
LFRS v VS Leicester CC 2019
Defended a company director facing 16 allegations of breaching the Fire Safety Order of over 30 a month arising from his management of a multi-occupational premises where two separate fires occurred.
-
HSE v FTT Stoke on Trent CC 2019
Defended a medium sized transport company against allegations of breach of s2/3 HSWA arising out of the risk of “HAVS” from vibration tools. A case featuring three experts and highly technical analysis of historic business records/vibration magnitude and trigger times.
-
HSE v An investment fund, Snaresbrook CC 2019
Defended an EU based fund which owned premises in London against complex allegations of breach of s4 HSWA arising from a near fatal accident.
-
Inquest re a company director, Hereford 2018
Represented a company director at inquest following a death on a construction site and where he was under investigation by HSE for breaches of s3/s37 HSWA.
-
Inquest re a global travel company 2018
Represented a global travel business at an inquest into a death arising whilst on a holiday excursion.
-
JHSL v HSE 2018
Successful in precedent setting Court of Appeal judgment on assessment of culpability, harm and costs.
Environment
Tim has been recognised as one of the UK’s leading advocates in environmental law since he successfully appeared for the defence in the leading environmental case of EA v Thorn International [2008] EWHC 2595 (Admin). In 2012 he was appointed to the Attorney General’s “A Panel” of approved regulatory counsel. Tim has been ranked by Chambers UK as a leader in this field for 14 years. Tim has an extensive advice practice working for very large public and private undertakings on all aspects of environmental law, regulatory compliance and enforcement with particular emphasis on the waste, nuclear and biofuels industries. He has particular expertise in the use of civil sanctions and POCA in the context of alleged infringements of environmental law. Tim regularly represents company directors accused of consenting or conniving in the alleged offending of their respective organisations during investigation.
In the last 10 years he has received instructions to advise and defend many of the UK’s largest environmental concerns and their directors in all aspects of environmental enforcement including:
- Pre-action advice and submissions to the Agency by a leading UK soil manufacturer.
- Advice and representation to various London Boroughs engaged in high value civil litigation arising from a contractual dispute with large environmental concern.
- Civil appeals against the refusal of an environmental permit and/or Agency accreditation.
- The use of Civil Undertakings as an alternative to prosecution for a successful waste operator and its company officers.
- A 6-week trial and contested confiscation in Sheffield CC against corporates and their officers arising from fly-tipping on an industrial scale.
- A 3-week trial and contested confiscation in Hereford CC arising from deliberate misuse of a quarry for illegal storage of waste.
- Confiscation and restraint where waste crime has been a species of economic crime.
Tim’s environmental advisory practice includes all aspects of environmental compliance of EU/UK/Agency rules with particular emphasis on the water, waste and biofuels industries. Tim is a contributing editor to LexisNexis PSL on waste law and frequently advises very large public and private undertakings on the impact of environmental regulation and law in the context of large scale commercial disputes or compliance litigation.
Representative cases
grid list-
Re A Very Large Manufacturer 2024
Instructed to represent a very large manufacturer and its company officers facing corporate manslaughter allegations, environmental offences, HSWA offences and fraud in highly complex and sensitive investigation.
-
MCA v Port of London Authority (“PLA”) and others Snaresbrook CC 2019
Successful defence of the PLA accused of serious maritime safety offences arising from a fatality on the Thames when a tugboat was “run over” by a barge it was towing down the River Thames. Trial before Thornton J lasting 7 weeks and hearing evidence from eight maritime experts. Acquitted.
-
Re a global telephone mobile telephone distributor and officers 2019
Advised multi-national company on compliance with EU waste law following acquisition of competitor.
-
Re CFL and AD 2019
Represented corporate landlord and director in proceedings following alleged breach of listed building consent for large scale commercial gain.
-
Re a waste management company 2018
Advised a large scale waste management company to settle a prosecution brought by the EA for the alleged deliberate breach of the EPR using civil undertakings as an alternative.
-
EA v A Ltd and directors 2018
Instructed by the EA in respect of unlawful storage of huge quantities of highly flammable waste creating serious risk of category 1 pollution event (very large fire in an urban area beside A roads). Complex fire risk and confiscation proceedings.
-
Re a biofuels company 2017
Advised innovative biofuels concern as to how successfully overcome EA resistance to the issuing of an environmental permit.
-
Re N Ltd 2017
Advised a large-scale waste management business on how to overcome EA criminal investigations to in order to obtain an environmental permit.
-
Re NPR 2017
Appeared in a precedent setting appeal against EA’s powers to refuse an accredited waste re-processor pursuant to the Producer Responsibility Regulations.
-
Re a Very Large Transport Undertaking 2016
Provided advice to a very large transport company concerning the application of environmental law to a complex and high value commercial dispute.
-
EA v WS 2016
Advised and represented company director following sensitive investigation into water pollution.
-
Re a soil company and directors 2015
Retained pre-charge to advise a leading soil company and its directors on how to respond to multiple EA investigations.
Inquests, Inquiries & Investigations
Inquiries and inquests are an essential part of Tim’s practice. He has been instructed since 2019 by Kingspan Insulation in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and to represent the HSE in the Covid Inquiry. His clients in this field include Gowlings, BLM, DWF, DAC Beachcroft, Knights, Addleshaw Goddard, Kennedy’s, Fisher Boyles, VWV, Network Rail and most leading national firms. In particular, Tim is very experienced in the application of A2 of the ECHR to the Coroners’ Court and in handling jury inquests. He is very well versed in the sensitive and complex disclosure and tactical issues that arise in simultaneous coronial, criminal and civil inquiries.
Tim has special experience of the Traffic Commissioner and has recently represented FTSE 250 companies concerned with revocation of vehicle licences at public inquiries.
In June 2020 Tim delivered a webinar concerning recent changes to inquest law and procedure to over 200 members for the Health and Safety Lawyers Association (“HSLA”). This followed Tim’s other successful partnerships with HSLA delivering advice on best practice before the HSLA annual conferences in 2019, 2018 and 2017 and a similar “road show” seminar program in 2016.
Representative cases
grid list-
Re AY 2024
Representing a very large US pharmaceutical manufacturer at A2 jury inquest arising from death of a construction worker from heart attack. Conclusion was death my natural causes – Covid vaccine was not causative of death.
-
Re JL 2024
Representing a very large US medical products manufacturer in inquest arising from death of a patient following implant of HVAD device and failure of device to re-start. Conclusion was death by natural causes – manufacturer’s actions were not causative.
-
Re AB 2024
Representing a very large US medical products company in inquest arising from death of patient implanted with heart pump. Conclusion was death by natural causes.
-
The Covid Inquiry 2023-24
Representing and leading the HSE response in this highly complex and sensitive Public Inquiry into the UK’s response to the pandemic.
-
Re AS 2024
Representing Network Rail at inquest arising from death of a Police Sergeant crossing a rail line during pursuit.
-
Re YB 2024
Representing Network Rail at inquest arising from death of a pedestrian using a public right of way adjacent to railway lines.
-
Re Grenfell Tower Inquiry 2019-24
Representing a very large corporation as a Core Participant in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry which manufactured insulation that was used in the cladding system at the Tower. Unprecedented sensitivity and complexity.
-
Re VW 2023
Representing a large civil engineering company in complex inquest arising from road traffic accident in temporary road traffic management works.
-
Re DT 2023
Representing a large engineering company at inquest concerning death of a motorcyclist.
-
Re OM 2021
Representing an Academy Trust during 4-week inquest arising from suicide of teenager.
-
Re Redmond and Parris 2021
Representing a large construction company in 4-week inquest arising from two deaths on a railway line during complex engineering works.
-
Re AD 2021
Representing a very large US pharmaceutical company following failure of a heart monitoring device.
-
Re BH 2021
Representing a very large US health manufacturer following suicide of key manager during lockdown.
-
Re Network Rail (“NR”) 2021
Representing NR is highly sensitive 8 day A2 inquest arising from double suicide near a railway line.
-
Re A Recycling Company 2020
Representing company wrongly accused by Police investigation causing death of homeless man. Difficult issues of causation for expert witnesses.
-
Re Scapa Limited 2019
For the company at inquest following death at work at global manufacturing concern. Impact on linked HSE prosecution.
-
Re St Michael Hospice 2019
For the hospice at 12 day inquest following arson at premises leading to the death of three patients. Unique complexity and sensitivity.
-
Re Thomas Cook Ltd 2018
For the company at inquest following death by drowning of a holiday maker in Cyprus and advised on response to PFDR. Highly sensitive.
-
Re A railway worker 2018
For the family of a deceased worker accidentally killed whilst maintaining the railway. Various IPs accused of health and safety failings leading to FDPR.
-
Re Large Food Manufacturer 2018
Represented FTSE 30 company at 3-day Traffic Commissioner public inquiry following allegations of fraud relating to the obtaining for vehicle licences. Very significant commercial interests at stack.
Product Safety
Tim Green KC is one of the Bar’s leading experts in product liability, product regulation, safety and enforcement. He has appeared in precedent setting contested applications against enforcement notices and product recall before the OPSS for various very large manufacturers, as well as against trading standards in negotiation, enforcement and trials arising out alleged defects in products and services. Tim frequently advises many global manufacturers in the engineering, bioscience and defence sectors on all aspects of product standards, safety, compliance and enforcement both before and during litigation and enforcement.
Representative cases
grid list-
Re AY 2024
Representing a very large US pharmaceutical manufacturer in A2 jury inquest arising from death of a young construction worker from heart attack following Covid vaccination. Conclusion: death by natural causes – vaccine non-causative.
-
Re JL 2024
Representing a very large US medical products manufacturer in inquest arising from death of a patient following implant of HVAD device and failure of device to re-start. Conclusion: alleged defects in HVAD device non-causative.
-
Re AB 2024
Representing a very large US medical products concern c in inquest arising from death of patient implanted with heart pump. Conclusion: failure of heart pump not causative of death.
-
Re a US manufacturer 2023
Advice and negotiation with trading standards in respect of self-reporting, enforcement and litigation risk for large US based home furnishings manufacturer.
-
Re OPSS v B Ltd 2023
Advice and representation to a very large construction manufacturer in OPSS enforcement action arising from alleged breach of EU standards.
-
Re OPSS v KI Ltd 2023
Advice and representation to a global manufacturer in the construction sector as to response, challenge and appeal against an OPSS investigation, enforcement notices and recall.
-
Re GD Ltd 2023
Advice to a global defence manufacturer in £3.5bn commercial dispute with HMG arising out of alleged defects in product standards.
-
Re MB Ltd 2022
Advice to multi-national luxury vehicle manufacturer as to compliance with EU/UK product standards and reputational and enforcement risks arising from alleged shortcomings.
-
Re BS Ltd 2021-22
Advice and representation to a US medical products manufacturer as to reputational risks arising from product defects and ensuing inquests.
Financial Services
In 2012 Tim was seconded to a “Technical Specialist” role in the FCA Enforcement Division and subsequently led FCA enforcement activity against banks, hedge funds, investment houses, retail financial services firms and senior managers. This practical experience working for the Authority gives him a unique insight into FCA principles, rules, powers and processes.
As a result of his experience both at the Authority, and since, Tim now frequently advises and represents large commercial concerns and their officer’s facing investigation by the FCA, SFO, HMRC, Trading Standards, FRC, The Pensions Regulator (“TPR”) and other financial regulators. He regularly defends company officers against TPR allegations of malfeasance arising from the administration of company pension schemes and was recently instructed by The Pensions Regulator to bring its first ever prosecution for general economic crime arising out of deliberate and systematic abuse of the automatic enrolment scheme for workplace pensions by a large company and its officers.
Between 2014 and 2022 Tim was directed to exercise the statutory functions of the Attorney General of the Isle of Man in respect of the Island’s largest ever investigation into tax fraud and money laundering.
Tim has a particular interest in AML law, the rules of beneficial ownership and financial regulation in off-shore financial center’s arising from his work in the Crown Dependencies.
He is an editor of the Lexis Nexis Encyclopedia of Financial Services Law and is a contributing editor to the latest edition of The Proceeds of Crime by Millington and Sutherland Williams.
Representative cases
grid list-
Op Braid 2014-2022
Exercised the statutory powers of the Attorney General IOM in respect of multi-jurisdictional tax and money laundering investigation with criminal, civil and public law cross-over.
-
Op V. 2021
Advised on complex multi-handed pensions fraud.
-
TPR v Workchain Ltd [2019] EWCA 1422
Instructed by the Pensions Regulator in respect of a precedent setting prosecution of a company, its directors and managers arising from unauthorised access to automatic enrolment data contrary to the Computer Misuse Act.
-
Re a large cosmetics company 2018
Advising and representing a large cosmetics business on managing and resisting a sensitive inquiry brought in respect of products sold and services supplied.
-
Bell v HMAG [2018] 2 ES
Successfully upheld a civil asset recovery order arising from a concurrent criminal investigation in another jurisdiction before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
-
Re a developer 2017
Advising a leading solicitor’s firm on its regulatory obligations in respect of the sale of investments in an unregulated collective investment scheme.
-
Re Peer to Peer Lending 2017
Advising a large US investor on the FCA rules governing P2P lending platforms and associated regulation.
-
In Re Claims Management Co. 2016
Advised one of the UK’s largest claims managements in respect of its obligations under the Enterprise Act pursuant to an investigation by trading standards.
-
Re Offshore Gaming Co. 2016
Advised regarding asset tracing and off-shore gaming law in the context of heavy commercial litigation arising out of a shareholder dispute.
-
Re Investment Co 2015
Advised an investment company on the application Prospectus Rules and issue of mini-bonds for P2P lending.
-
Re the FSCS 2014
Represented multiple investors on a successful challenge to the FSCS following liquidation of regulated firms.
-
Re a major health insurer 2014
Successfully advised a leading private health insurer on the application of FCA Handbook to sale of insurance products to schools.
-
Re a leading solicitor’s firm 2014
Successfully advised a leading solicitor of the application of CIS rules to the sale of apartments to investors in China.
-
Operation S IOM 2014
Led and advised an investigation into fraud and financial wrongdoing by company directors in an offshore financial centre. The investigation was highly sensitive and linked to the prosecution of prominent law officers in the jurisdiction.
Proceeds of Crime
Tim Green has been recommended by Chambers UK as one the Bar’s leaders in proceeds of crime work for the last 10 years. In a unique appointment, Tim is authorised to exercise the powers of the Attorney General of the Isle of Man in respect of a complex multi-jurisdictional money laundering investigation and is an expert in the regulation and enforcement of AML in offshore financial centres.
Tim is frequently instructed by FTSE 250 companies and their officers; international and national firms; banks, lenders and regulators to act as advisor and advocate in respect of difficult investigations arising from AML compliance, cash forfeiture, asset recovery and confiscation. He recently advised an offshore government on the investigation and prosecution of sophisticated financial crime arising from corporate malfeasance and bankruptcy. Tim was a member of the national committee of the Proceeds of Crime Lawyer Association for 5 years and is a contributing editor to OUP’s “The Proceeds of Crime”.
Representative cases
grid list-
Re Op B 2015-2023
Complex multi-jurisdictional fraud and money laundering operation.
-
Re GIGL Croydon CC 2020
Representing Global Casino brand asserting third parties’ rights to a disputed account balance following unlawful gaming.
-
Operation B 2014 - 2019
Multi-jurisdictional investigation into large scale tax fraud and money laundering concerning a variety of off-shore financial centres and the professional services sector.
-
Re a Global Lender 2018
Advice to bespoke lender applying flexible application of the KYC and due diligence rules in various EU AML Codes.
-
Bell v HMAG [2018] 2 ES
Precedent-setting application for cash forfeiture before the Staff of Government Division of the High Court of the Isle of Man and Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
-
Re a Gaming Firm 2017
Off-shore AML advice arising from shareholder dispute.
-
Environment Agency v Moss and others Sheffield CC 2016
The first EA prosecution for money laundering arising from organized unlawful waste operation.
-
Operation S 2013
Off-shore financial investigation into corporate wrong-doing by company officers linked to the government and legal services.
What the directories say
"Tim Green is a good operator."
Chambers UK 2025
"Clients trust him and listen when he speaks."
Chambers UK 2025
"His contributions are always well thought through and focused on the consequences."
Chambers UK 2025
"Tim is very measured and incisive in terms of comments."
Chambers UK 2025
"Tim Green has been superb."
Chambers UK 2025
News and articles
Alerter by Tim Green KC & Freya Foster -...
Chambers UK 2025 – Top Band Rankings for...
Alerter by Tim Green KC & Douglas Maxwell - The...
Legal 500 2025 Guide – Top Tier Rankings for...
Alerter by Tim Green KC & Georgina Pein - How to...
Henderson Chambers nominated for 12 awards at The...
Instructing Tim Green KC
If you require help or advice please contact our clerking team
Call +44 (0)20 7583 9020
or email
- 2022 King’s Counsel (QC).
- 2014 Authorised as Attorney General Isle of Man for Operation Braid.
- 2012 to present – Recorder Crime (SSO ticket).
- 2012 to present – “A Panel” Attorney General’s List of Approved Regulatory Counsel (reappointed 2019).
- Contributing Editor – “Lexis Nexis Financial Services Encyclopedia”
- Contributing Editor – “The Proceeds of Crime” by OUP
- HSLA
- FSLA
- POCLA
- UKELA
- Midland Circuit
- 1996 – Kalisher Scholarship, Grays Inn
- 1996 – Very Competent, BVC
- 1995 – Commendation Diploma in Law
- 1994 – MA Magdalen College, Oxford
All members of Chambers are registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales. For our standard contractual terms click here.
For more information about the way barristers at Henderson Chambers work, including our fee transparency statement and our complaints process, please click here.
Bar Council Number: 35279
VAT Registration Number: 715490241
Legal Status: King’s Counsel
Professional Insurance: All members of Chambers have professional liability insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Ltd. Territorial coverage is world-wide and subject to the term of the Bar Mutual. Click here for details.
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board.