James practices in three core areas: product liability and group actions; the law of the workplace, including employment and health & safety; and general commercial work.
Since 2018 James has been part of the team acting for GSK in the high-profile Seroxat product liability litigation, listed by the Lawyer Magazine as one of its top 20 cases for 2019. He has also been instructed at every stage of the Cape v Dring litigation concerning non-party access to documents used in court, which reached the Supreme Court in February 2019. He was also sole counsel for the claimant in King v Sash Window Workshop, a landmark recent ECJ decision on holiday pay and workers’ rights.
After qualifying as a solicitor in 2008, James spent two years as an associate in the corporate group at Slaughter and May. He was a judicial assistant at the Court of Appeal in 2010. He is committed to giving practical advice and resolving disputes as quickly and cost-effectively as possible. James will always consider accepting pro bono instructions, particularly in employment disputes.
Product Liability & Group Actions
Since May 2018 James has been instructed on behalf of GSK in the long-running Seroxat group litigation. The claimants allege that the SSRI prescription anti-depressant Seroxat (or paroxetine) is defective within the meaning of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. Listed for a three-month trial in the summer of 2019, the Court made an early ruling on the scope of the action in GSK’s favour which led the trial to be vacated. The appeal from that ruling is pending before the Court of Appeal with a hearing at the end of October 2019.
James was part of the team acting for the defendant in Concept 70 v Cape Intermediate Holdings in early 2017. The case concerned liabilities for historic asbestos exposure: the former employers of workers suffering from mesothelioma sought (through their insurers) a contribution from Cape under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 towards settlement sums paid out. The case settled after the conclusion of a six-week trial in the Queen’s Bench Division in February 2017.
James was then instructed throughout the ongoing Cape v Dring litigation concerning non-party access to documents used at the trial which reached the Supreme Court in February 2019 and is now the leading case on the extent to which non-parties can access documents generated or used in litigation.
Also in the field of industrial disease, James was instructed as junior by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (as successor to the liabilities of the National Coal Board) in the British Coal Coke Oven Workers Litigation under a GLO, which came to trial before Turner J in the summer of 2018. He is still instructed by DBEIS in individual legacy cases in connection with the British Coal Respiratory Disease Litigation.
James was instructed by Smith & Nephew, the medical equipment manufacturers, in the early stages of the recent metal-on-metal hip replacement litigation.
In individual product liability matters James was led by Geraint Webb QC acting for Bednest Ltd following the death of a baby in a bedside sleeper in April 2015; and for BMW following an accident involving a BMW 3 Series vehicle. He has also acted on a range of smaller disputes over allegedly defective goods including domestic appliances, fertilizers, perfume, cement products and vehicle components.
Whilst a C Panellist, James has also been involved several multi-claimant actions for the Ministry of Defence, including the Q Fever, Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Non-Freezing Cold Injury litigation. He also assisted with some of the complex costs issues arising out of the GLO following the dismissal of the claim by the British Nuclear Test Veterans in the Supreme Court.
Representative cases include:
• The Seroxat Litigation at  EWHC 337 (QB) and at  EWHC 1167 (QB);  All ER (D) 83 (May)
• Concept 70 v Cape Intermediate Holdings (settled after trial but before judgment in 2017)
• Dring v Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd  EWCA Civ 1795,  1 All ER 804,  1 WLR 479 in the Court of Appeal
• Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring  UKSC 38,  3 WLR 429,  All ER (D) 161 (Jul) in the Supreme Court
• The British Coal Coke Oven Workers Litigation  EWHC 2009 (QB),  All ER (D) 29 (Aug)
Representative casesgrid list
Concept 70 v Cape Intermediate Holdings
Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of the Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum)  EWCA Civ 1795
The British Coal Coke Oven Workers Litigation  EWHC 2009 (QB)
The Metal-on-Metal Hip Litigation
James has wide experience of all aspects of both statutory and common law employment work including employment status, unfair dismissal, TUPE, discrimination, redundancy and whistleblowing. He appears frequently in the Employment Tribunal and EAT and advises both employers and claimants. He is also experienced in litigation and injunction applications in the County Court and High Court involving employee competition, confidential information, wrongful dismissal and restrictive covenants
James has a particular interest in working time and acted as sole counsel for the claimant throughout one of the most significant cases on holiday pay to reach the ECJ in recent years: King v Sash Window Workshop Ltd C-214/16. The case is particularly relevant to the growing number of cases where the worker (like Mr King) is miscategorised during the employment relationship as self-employed and thus not paid any holiday pay. The case was described as a “bombshell judgment” and is of fundamental importance to workers’ rights in the gig economy. The matter settled in November 2018 shortly before it was due to return to the Court of Appeal.
In the autumn of 2019 James was acting for two claimants in a major discrimination, whistleblowing and equal pay claim against a leading national mortgage broker; for the respondents in the long-running Akhigbe case which has so involved four separate Employment Tribunal claims and two full appeals in the EAT; and a number of ongoing cases in the ET, with a particular focus on holiday pay.
Helped by his experience in group actions involving personal injury, James is also familiar with the law of employer’s liability, health and safety and workplace injury claims. His commercial background means he is also happy to advise in employment disputes with a commercial dimension such as unfair prejudice claims.
Representative cases include:
• Hospital Medical Group v Westwood  EWCA Civ 1005,  ICR 415 – appeared (as junior to Patrick Green QC) in the Court of Appeal on behalf of the appellant. The decision was for a while the leading case on the meaning of “worker” for the purposes of s.230 of the ERA 1996 and reg 2 of the WTR 1998.
• Bal v Parallel Realisations 1 Ltd (in admin) (2012) UKEAT/0215/12,  All ER (D) 34 (Jan) – appeared as sole counsel on behalf of the successful appellant against the ET’s refusal to allow a review of its original decision on remedy (on the basis of relevant evidence of a TUPE transfer coming to light after the original hearing).
• Pan v Portigon AG London Branch (2013) UKEAT/0116/12,  All ER (D) 53 (Sep) – appeared (as junior to Patrick Green QC) in the EAT on behalf of the appellant in a race discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal case. The appeal was mainly concerned with the “Burns – Barke process” and related points of ET procedure.
• Sash Window Workshop v King  IRLR 348 (EAT) and in the ECJ King v SWWL  2 CMLR 223,  IRLR 142,  ICR 693, (2017) Times, 26 December,  All ER (D) 213 (Nov). James acted for Mr King (as sole counsel at every stage) in an important case concerning working time and the entitlement to a payment in lieu on termination for accrued but untaken holiday. The EAT also addressed whether the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift in PI damages applies in the Employment Tribunal.
• T-Systems Ltd v Lewis (2015) UKEAT/0042/15 – acted as sole counsel on behalf of the appellant employer in a case concerning the proper approach to the phrase “something arising in consequence of [her] disability” in s.15 of the Equality Act 2010 and its relationship with the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
• Akhigbe v St Edward Homes Ltd (2019) UKEAT/0005/18 and (2019) UKEAT/0110/18,  ICR D6 – acted as sole counsel on behalf of the employer responding to two conjoined appeals from the claimant from ET preliminary decisions. The first raised questions about striking out a whistleblowing claim at a PH. The second considered abuse of process arguments in the context of the EC process and in particular the use of the same EC certificate to bring separate ET claims.
• James appeared as junior to Malcolm Sheehan QC for the MoD, the successful defendant, in Vaughan v Ministry of Defence  EWHC 1404 (QB),  All ER (D) 207 (May), a decision concerning the limits of an employer’s liability for personal injury in the context of off-duty service personnel.
Representative casesgrid list
Sash Window Workshop v King  IRLR 348 and in the ECJ King v SWWL  2 CMLR 223,  ICR 693
The case returns to the Court of Appeal in November 2018. James has acted for Mr King (as sole counsel at every stage) in an important case concerning working time and the entitlement to a payment in lieu on termination for accrued but untaken holiday. The case also considered whether the 10% uplift in PI damages mandated by Simmons v Castle applies in the Employment Tribunal.
Vaughan v Ministry of Defence  EWHC 1404 (QB)
James appeared as junior to Malcolm Sheehan QC for the MoD, the successful defendant, in Vaughan v Ministry of Defence  EWHC 1404 (QB),  All ER (D) 207 (May), a decision concerning the limits of an employer’s liability for personal injury in the context of off-duty service personnel.
T-Systems Ltd v Lewis (2015) UKEAT/0042/15
Acted as sole counsel on behalf of the appellant employer in a case concerning the proper approach to the phrase “something arising in consequence of [her] disability” in s.15 of the Equality Act 2010 and its relationship with the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
Pan v Portigon AG London Branch (2013) UKEAT/0116/12/LA,  All ER (D) 53 (Sep)
Appeared (as junior to Patrick Green QC) in the EAT on behalf of the appellant in a race discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal case. The appeal was mainly concerned with the “Burns – Barke process” and related points of ET procedure.
Hospital Medical Group v Westwood  EWCA Civ 1005,  ICR 415
Appeared (as junior to Patrick Green QC) in the Court of Appeal on behalf of the appellant. The decision was for a while the leading case on the meaning of “worker” for the purposes of s.230 of the ERA 1996 and reg 2 of the WTR 1998.
Bal v Parallel Realisations 1 Ltd (in admin) (2012) UKEAT/0215/12/DM,  All ER (D) 34 (Jan)
Appeared as sole counsel on behalf of the successful appellant against the ET’s refusal to allow a review of its original decision on remedy (on the basis of relevant evidence of a TUPE transfer coming to light after the original hearing).
Company, Commercial & Insolvency
James has a broad and growing commercial practice. He was recently instructed by a Jersey-based fund in a major arbitration under LCIA Rules over its refusal to pay out to an investor associated with various alleged frauds in different European jurisdictions.
His background as a City solicitor enables James to advise on all aspects of company law. Whilst an associate at Slaughter and May he worked in the corporate / insurance group on a range of transactions, including the creation of the Asset Protection Scheme by HM Treasury to deal with the UK banking crisis in 2009, and Prudential PLC’s proposed rights issue and $36bn bid in 2010 for the AIA insurance group. He also gained experience of commercial agreements, regulatory, outsourcing, insurance and IT issues.
Between 2014 and 2016 James undertook a part-time secondment at HSBC, assisting with the FCA-led Review of mis-sold interest-rate hedging products and the assessment of consequential loss claims by HSBC customers.
Representative recent cases include:
• Advising an AIM-listed company about its liability for brokers’ commission payments following a successful placing.
• Appearing in the Chancery Division (on behalf of a creditor with the benefit of a retention of title clause) in resisting an application by the administrators of a digital media company for an order under paragraph 72 of schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 to dispose of an asset in its possession.
• Acting for a major bus operator in a dispute with a software supplier over the performance of an IT system designed to reduce fuel consumption and emissions.
• An unfair prejudice petition (and parallel Employment Tribunal proceedings) for a photographer forced out of the business he co-owned by his fellow directors.
• Acting for the MoD in relation to a commercial claim over the condition and description of two former RFA vessels sold for scrap.
• Appearing in the TCC on behalf of the successful applicant in AMP v Persons Unknown  EWHC 3454 (TCC),  All ER (D) 178 (Jan), believed to be the first case to use an injunction to restrain file-sharing through BitTorrent technology.
• Advising an English local authority on the viability of financial derivative / swap transactions in the light of the Localism Act 2011.
• Acting for the finance company of an agricultural vehicle manufacturer over the enforcement of personal guarantees from the directors of its insolvent counterparty.
Health & Safety and Inquests
James is developing his Health and Safety practice. He has considerable experience of inquests and the coronial process, especially in the context of deaths in custody. He has undertaken several long jury inquests, usually acting for the Ministry of Justice or prison healthcare providers.
He also has experience of defending HSE prosecutions. He has advised on HSE investigations and proposed fines, and appeared on behalf of defendants at several sentencing hearings.
James also has experience in personal injury litigation, mostly acting for the Government, in the High Court and County Court. He has particular experience in workplace claims involving asbestos and industrial disease.
Recent instructions include:
• Acting for the Ministry of Justice at the inquest into the death of a prisoner at HMP New Hall.
• Acting for Virgin Healthcare, the outsourced healthcare provider, in an inquest into the death of a prisoner at HMP Coldingley.
• Representing the Ministry of Justice in an inquest into the suicide of a prisoner at HMP Northumberland.
• Advising a film production company on the likely level of fine from the HSE after an injury to an actor on set.
• Acting for Bednest Ltd (led by Geraint Webb QC) in relation to an inquest into the death of a seven-week-old baby in a bedside sleeper.
• Advising a Community Benefit Society in relation to an HSE investigation into its installation of rooftop solar panels and alleged breaches of the Working at Height Regulations 2005.
• Acting for a catering company defending an HSE prosecution after one of its sub-contractors exposed asbestos in a school canteen.
James was a choral scholar at Christ’s College, Cambridge and is currently Chairman of the Holst Singers. He was a TA soldier from 2004-09.
News and articles
Court of Appeal dismisses claimants’ appeal in...
Henderson Chambers team feature in The Lawyer’s...
James Williams nominated for ‘Junior Barrister...
Court of Appeal decision on the ability of...
Jonathan Lewis promoted to the Attorney...
A sash window of opportunity for workers? Holiday...
Instructing James Williams
If you require help or advice please contact our clerking team
Call +44 (0)20 7583 9020
- Junior Counsel to the Crown (C panel) (2014-2019)
- Associate in Corporate group at Slaughter & May (2008-2010)
- Qualified as a solicitor (2008)
- Commercial Bar Association (COMBAR)
- Employment Lawyers Association (ELA)
- Employment Law Bar Association (ELBA)
- Health & Safety Lawyers’ Association (HSLA)
- BPP Law School, 2003-05 (GDL 2004; LPC 2005)
- Christ’s College, Cambridge 2000-03 (MA History, 1st class)
All members of Chambers are registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales. For our standard contractual terms click here.
Bar Council Number: 558134
VAT Registration Number: 132268334
Legal Status: Barrister
Professional Insurance: All members of Chambers have professional liability insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Ltd. Territorial coverage is world-wide and subject to the term of the Bar Mutual. Click here for details.
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board.