SAAMCO – back with a hard edge in BPE v Hughes-Holland
This article by Matthew Bradley was first published in Butterworths’ Journal of International Banking and Finance Law.
In this article, Matthew Bradley summarises the recent Supreme Court decision in BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland  UKSC 21 (also reported as Gabriel v Little  UKSC 21) and some of its practical implications, in particular as they concern (i) a claimant’s burden of proof, (ii) lenders’ claims against solicitors and (iii) investment advice claims.
To read the article in full, please see here.
This article forms part of an ongoing series being written by members of the Henderson Chambers Banking Finance and Consumer Credit group for the Butterworths’ Journal of International Banking and Finance Law.